HIV Testing

Methods, Laws, and Issues

(Updated 16 March 2007)

What to test for

  • Blood banks
    • test for HIV1 and HIV2
    • set sensitivity very high (lots of false positives)
  • Personal tests (screening)
    • usually only HIV1
    • usually only for antibody
    • not reported (+) unless confirmed

Kinds of HIV Tests

  • Test for presence of antibodies
  • Test for presence of HIV

Differences in the Tests

  • What is detected?
    • antibody
    • antigen (protein from HIV)
    • DNA integrated in cells
    • RNA of free virus or active infection
  • What binds to the target of detection?
  • How is the signal amplified

Antibody tests: ELISA

  • “Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay”
  • Detects presence of anti-HIV antibodies
  • Start with antigen-coated beads or slides
  • Add serum (blood) to be tested
  • Beads get coated with antibodies or not
  • Then presence of antibodies detected by color test

More detailed version

  • Mix antigen-coated beads with serum to be tested.
  • Wash beads to remove all antibodies that are not specific for the antigen on the beads
  • Mix the beads with a “tagged” antibody from goats that binds to human antibodies
  • If no human antibodies were able to bind the antigen coated beads, no goat antibody will bind
  • If the antigen-coated beads were covered with anti-HIV specific human antibodies from the blood, then the goat antibodies will bind all over the place
  • Goat antibody is linked to an enzyme that keeps converting a colorless compound to a very colorful one.
  • If no “tagged” goat antibodies on the beads, no color develops
  • If beads have lots of “tagged” goat antibodies, color keeps developing.

Results of ELISA Test

  • Lots of false positives
    • the test is purposely made too sensitive
    • must retest to be sure using another test that is less sensitive, but more specific.
  • Some false negatives
    • window period between active infection and first signs of an immune response against HIV

How are ELISA data used

  • Blood banks
    • A single positive and the blood is sterilized and discarded
  • Personal tests
    • The test is repeated twice more
      • if both are negative, result is reported as negative
      • if one or more is positive, do a Western Blot before reporting

Western Blot

  • Also detects anti-HIV antibodies
  • Great for showing specific vs. non-specific
  • More expensive (ten-fold) and more skill required
  • Still a screening test

How do Western Blots work?

  • Separate HIV proteins by size and “blot” to special paper
  • This establishes a very specific pattern or picture of where the proteins are AND WHERE THEY ARE NOT! m
  • Add serum (blood) to be tested.
    • If anti-HIV antibodies present, they bind where proteins are and repeat the pattern
    • If non-specific stuff is there, it binds randomly or at least in the “wrong” places.
  • Detect human antibodies with goat anti-human antibodies and a color reaction again.
  • Advantages of Western Blots
    • Very specific
    • Done on same samples as ELISA
  • Disadvantages of Western Blots
    • Not very sensitive (only useful if ELISA positive)
    • Not easy to “standardize”

Sensitivity and Specificity

  • Knowing the precise frequency of false positives and false negatives from ELISA vs. Western Blot, can use a correction factor to get real prevalence of HIV (+) in the population from ELISA alone

Nucleic Acid based tests

  • PCR to detect DNA (in cells)
  • RT-PCR and branched DNA to detect RNA (in cells or in viruses)

PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) (See Cartoon in lecture)

RT-PCR

  • Reverse Transcriptase + PCR
  • Reverse transcriptase converts RNA into DNA (remember, that’s how retroviruses like HIV work!)
  • Then PCR amplifies DNA as before

Sensitivity of RT-PCR

  • Can detect a about 500 RNA molecules per ml of blood.
  • VERY sensitive!

Names Reporting and Testing

  • CDC does not keep names for HIV
    • County and state sometime do
  • AIDS vs HIV
    • 50 states require AIDS reporting by name
    • 33 (including Michigan) require HIV to state (by name)
  • AIDS reporting tracks infections of previous decade. HIV is closer to present

Some differences

  • 12 states list HIV as an STD
  • 16 states list HIV as a communicable disease
  • 23 states list HIV as a “separate catagory”
  • 12 states allow physicians to notify partners

Some interesting numbers

  • About 30% of HIV(+) persons do not know that they are positive
  • About 30% of those tested for HIV do so to find out their status
    • the rest are meeting some requirement
      • blood donation

Should HIV Testing be Compulsory?

The present status

  • 29 states allow involuntary testing under some conditions
  • 27 states require parental consent for testing of teens
  • 23 states (Michigan included) allow teens to consent without parental permission
  • otherwise testing is “battery” or “unlawful touching”

Voluntary Testing

  • Names or no names?
  • how to follow up with counselling if no names?
  • Voluntary can give a skewed representation
  • are highest risk persons most likely to be tested or least likely?

Mandatory Testing

  • Mandatory: not forced. Required for some other non-required activity
    • give blood
    • travel overseas
  • Syphilis testing was mandatory
    • not cost effective (only 1% of new cases discovered this way
  • Problem is confidentiality

Compulsory testing

  • 44 states (Michigan included) can compel HIV testing of those convicted of or charged with sex offenses.
    • NOTE: even if only charged!
  • 10 states (Michigan included) compel testing of convicted prostitutes
    • continued unsafe sex is then a felony!

The Confidentiality issue

  • This is central to the debate
  • Loss of job, insurance, etc.
  • Social stigma
  • Homosexuality and IDU are still illegal in many states (Michigan included)
    • In Michigan, “sodomy” is a felony — but is not enforced in Wayne county.

Do Partners Disclose? — One study:

  • 40% did NOT tell their partner
    • 58% of those did not use condoms regularly
    • mostly poor, IDU, and lacking a high school diploma
    • blacks were 3 times less likely to tell partners than other groups
  • Why not tell?