Once you’ve looked at the text as a whole, use a similar set of steps to understand the organization of each part. By breaking down a text in this way, you’ll be able to locate its key arguments.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Signposts<\/strong> are the basic structural cues in a piece of writing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Results<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Sample*<\/strong> General analysis*<\/strong> In addition to telling you what a paragraph will be about, topic sentences function as miniature arguments.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Scholars know very little about how and why women are motivated to play fantasy sport other than that the traditional gender-based hegemony persists (Davis and Duncan, 2006), but a great deal of information has accumulated related to the role of fantasy sport within the larger sport marketplace.<\/strong>\u00a0For instance, we know fantasy sport is big business economically ($1.5 billion as of Kassen, 2006) and the people who play often become consumed by it (see St. Amant, 2005; Walker, 2006). Nesbit and King (2010) established a direct link between fantasy sport play and TV viewership and a larger report from\u2026<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n When reading, try to identify how topic sentences support the larger argument. You can also use them to decide if a paragraph seems important enough to read closely.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Signal phrases are expressions like:<\/p>\n\n\n\n “In this section, I argue…”<\/strong> Thus, relational and identity-oriented differences result in clear divisions in the ways men and women consume sports media.\u00a0However, the first research question<\/strong>\u00a0is postulated with a specific aim of determining whether such divides hold true in the ancillary but related field of fantasy sport play:<\/p>\n\n\n\n The first research question [RQ] is postulated: Does fantasy sport consumption differ between men and women?<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n Authors use signal phrases to:<\/p>\n\n\n\n Signal phrases<\/strong> are clues the author leaves to identify her most important claims.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Even if you’re moving quickly, don’t forget to look at footnotes and endnotes. They contain extra information that can help you.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In some citation styles, footnotes contain all citational information, which helps you to track the author’s use of other texts and find additional sources to look at yourself.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Theoretical views about the import of facts surface, quite frequently in fiction. Marilyn Robinson, in her recent novel, Housekeeping, for instance, invites us to reconsider the weight we have afforded the \u201cfacts\u201d in our century.\u00b9 Saul Bellow, too, has his character Henderson comment on the problematics of tangible value in the novel Henderson the Rain King, telling his companion that \u201creality may be terrible,\u201d but it is, from his point of view, \u201cbetter than what we\u2019ve got.\u201d\u00b2<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u00b9 Marilyn Robinson, Housekeeping (New York: Bantam Books, 1972): 217. Sometimes authors write a longer footnote where they elaborate on ideas that are not important enough to discuss in the body of the text. Therefore, if you’re interested in what the author is saying in the body, check to see if the footnote contains more information.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The three little pigs built their houses out of straw,\u00b9 sticks,\u00b2 and bricks.\u00b3<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u00b9 not to be confused with hay As you can see (look, a signal phrase!), there is a logic to the organization of academic writing: each section of a well-crafted argument serves a purpose within the larger argument. When reading, use signposts, topic sentences, and internal structures and transitions to determine how each section or paragraph connects to the other pieces of the argument. What does it do for the author’s argument?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n *Taken from\u00a0Ruihley, Brody J. and Andrew C. Billings. \u201cInfiltrating the boys\u2019 club: Motivations for women\u2019s fantasy sport participation.\u201d\u00a0International Review for the Sociology of Sport,<\/em>\u00a0vol. 48, no. 4, 2013, pp. 435-452.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n
The sample in this study totaled 530 adult fantasy sport participants. This sample is composed of both men (n=348) and women (n=182), with the mean age of the sample at 30.1 years. The average age of men was measured at 28.4 years (SD=10.4); for women it was 33.3 years (SD=13.0). The men identified as predominately single (n=165, 47.4%) followed by being married (n=114, 32.8%) while the majority of women identified as being married (n=74, 40.7%) followed by being single (n=51, 28.0%).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In this research, it is important to understand not only the answers to the research questions, but also the data behind the answers. In this case, a backwards regression analysis was conducted to determine what, if any, factors are contributing to the areas of sport knowledge and the fantasy sport motives.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\nRead topic sentences<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Identify signal phrases<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
or
“In contrast to author X, who claims Y…”<\/strong>
or words like
“therefore”<\/strong>\u00a0or “however”<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n
Footnotes and endnotes<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
\u00b2 Saul Bellow, Henderson the Rain King (New York: Penguin Books, 1965): 105.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
\u00b2 or lumber, according to some sources
\u00b3 probably fired clay bricks<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n