{"id":287,"date":"2021-02-16T20:57:14","date_gmt":"2021-02-16T20:57:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/sites.lsa.umich.edu\/oaxaca-archaeology\/?page_id=287"},"modified":"2023-02-07T20:03:59","modified_gmt":"2023-02-07T20:03:59","slug":"origins-of-hieroglyphic-writing-2","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/sites.lsa.umich.edu\/oaxaca-archaeology\/origins-of-hieroglyphic-writing-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Origins of Hieroglyphic Writing"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\" style=\"font-size:17px\">Four major ethnic groups in ancient Mexico used hieroglyphic writing &#8212;-the Zapotec, the Maya, the Mixtec, and the Aztec. The Zapotec system is both the oldest and the least widely studied.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\" style=\"font-size:17px\">Our oldest carved stone with Zapotec glyphs is Monument 3 of San Jos\u00e9 Mogote, which dates to the Late Rosario phase (see the section on <a href=\"https:\/\/sites.lsa.umich.edu\/oaxaca-archaeology\/origins-of-social-inequality\/\" data-type=\"page\" data-id=\"157\">The Origins of Social Inequality<\/a>). It was discovered <em>in situ <\/em>in 1975 by Joyce Marcus while digging near San Jos\u00e9 Mogote\u2019s main temple. This stone was laid horizontally in a corridor, where it could be trod upon. The image one steps on is that of an enemy captive whose heart had been removed. Two streams of blood from his chest end in a \u201cdrop of blood\u201d motif that had been used since the earlier Guadalupe phase. Between the captive\u2019s feet is his hieroglyphic name, \u201c1 Motion.\u201d This stone was likely carved less than a century before the leaders of San Jos\u00e9 Mogote moved their followers to the summit of Monte Alb\u00e1n. There they carved hundreds of similar depictions of slain captives, a form of political propaganda aimed at intimidating their enemies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-8f761849 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:15%\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-8f761849 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:75%\"><div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"alignleft size-large is-resized\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/sites.lsa.umich.edu\/oaxaca-archaeology\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/883\/2021\/02\/Fig-15-zz6.16-782x1024.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-198\" width=\"548\" height=\"718\" srcset=\"https:\/\/sites.lsa.umich.edu\/oaxaca-archaeology\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/883\/2021\/02\/Fig-15-zz6.16-782x1024.jpg 782w, https:\/\/sites.lsa.umich.edu\/oaxaca-archaeology\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/883\/2021\/02\/Fig-15-zz6.16-229x300.jpg 229w, https:\/\/sites.lsa.umich.edu\/oaxaca-archaeology\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/883\/2021\/02\/Fig-15-zz6.16-768x1005.jpg 768w, https:\/\/sites.lsa.umich.edu\/oaxaca-archaeology\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/883\/2021\/02\/Fig-15-zz6.16-1173x1536.jpg 1173w, https:\/\/sites.lsa.umich.edu\/oaxaca-archaeology\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/883\/2021\/02\/Fig-15-zz6.16.jpg 1375w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 548px) 100vw, 548px\" \/><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-align-left wp-block-paragraph\" style=\"font-size:14px\">Figure 15. This carved stone at San Jos\u00e9 Mogote (Monument 3) shows a sacrificial victim whose carved body could be stepped on by anyone entering the corridor between two temple platforms. The victim has had his heart removed; blood flows from his chest to the edge of the stone, ending in two examples of the \u201cblood drop\u201d motif (a circle + triangle). (Marcus 2020)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:15%\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-8f761849 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-8f761849 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:20%\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:50%\"><div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-large is-resized\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/sites.lsa.umich.edu\/oaxaca-archaeology\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/883\/2021\/02\/Fig-16-zz6.38-683x1024.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-197\" width=\"512\" height=\"764\" \/><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\" style=\"font-size:15px\">Figure 16. This Monte Alb\u00e1n I monument, one of more than 300 that depict sacrificed enemies, has one column of hieroglyphs extending from his neck to his knees and three more hieroglyphs in front of his face. He has suffered genital mutilation. (Marcus 2020)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:7%\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\" style=\"font-size:17px\">Joyce Marcus of UMMAA began studying Zapotec writing in 1972 after previously working on Maya hieroglyphs. She found that during Period I of Monte Alb\u00e1n (500 BC-AD 1 in conventional radiocarbon years) that capital city had a monopoly on hieroglyphic inscriptions, most of which dealt with themes of sacrificing rivals. Two stelae at Monte Alb\u00e1n (nos. 12 and 13) refer to an early ruler and identify the writing system as Zapotec by the use of numbers after day names (which only occurs in Zapotec) and a pun that makes sense only if the language was Zapotec (\u201cfirst born son\u201d and \u201chuman thumb\u201d were homonyms or sound-alike words).&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-8f761849 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:17%\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:75%\"><div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"alignleft size-large is-resized\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/sites.lsa.umich.edu\/oaxaca-archaeology\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/883\/2021\/02\/Fig17_st-12-13-website_edited-1-1024x1000.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-202\" width=\"539\" height=\"527\" srcset=\"https:\/\/sites.lsa.umich.edu\/oaxaca-archaeology\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/883\/2021\/02\/Fig17_st-12-13-website_edited-1-1024x1000.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/sites.lsa.umich.edu\/oaxaca-archaeology\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/883\/2021\/02\/Fig17_st-12-13-website_edited-1-300x293.jpg 300w, https:\/\/sites.lsa.umich.edu\/oaxaca-archaeology\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/883\/2021\/02\/Fig17_st-12-13-website_edited-1-768x750.jpg 768w, https:\/\/sites.lsa.umich.edu\/oaxaca-archaeology\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/883\/2021\/02\/Fig17_st-12-13-website_edited-1-1536x1499.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/sites.lsa.umich.edu\/oaxaca-archaeology\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/883\/2021\/02\/Fig17_st-12-13-website_edited-1-2048x1999.jpg 2048w, https:\/\/sites.lsa.umich.edu\/oaxaca-archaeology\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/883\/2021\/02\/Fig17_st-12-13-website_edited-1-307x300.jpg 307w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 539px) 100vw, 539px\" \/><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-align-left wp-block-paragraph\" style=\"font-size:15px\">Figure 17. These two Monte Alb\u00e1n I stelae were found associated with multiple carvings of sacrificial victims. The text starts with the Zapotec year sign and may be read \u201cIn the year 4 Lightning a man named 8 Water, a first-born son, was seated in office.\u201d (Marcus 2020)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:15%\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\" style=\"font-size:17px\">During Monte Alb\u00e1n\u2019s Period II (AD 1-250 in conventional radiocarbon years), one important theme for hieroglyphic writing was defining the territory claimed by Monte Alb\u00e1n. Subject localities were given by carving a \u201chill\u201d or \u201cplace\u201d glyph, accompanied by other glyphs specifying the place. So far only about a dozen of these places can be linked to known localities&#8212;for example, Cuicatl\u00e1n (\u201cThe Place of Song\u201d), Sosola (\u201cThe Place of the Pierced Face\u201d), and Tututepec (\u201cHill of the Bird\u201d). Such places are 75-150 km from Monte Alb\u00e1n, indicating the extent of Monte Alb\u00e1n\u2019s influence at its peak.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-8f761849 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:20%\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:75%\"><div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-large is-resized\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/sites.lsa.umich.edu\/oaxaca-archaeology\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/883\/2021\/02\/Fig-18-zz8.39-693x1024.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-196\" width=\"520\" height=\"768\" srcset=\"https:\/\/sites.lsa.umich.edu\/oaxaca-archaeology\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/883\/2021\/02\/Fig-18-zz8.39-693x1024.jpg 693w, https:\/\/sites.lsa.umich.edu\/oaxaca-archaeology\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/883\/2021\/02\/Fig-18-zz8.39-203x300.jpg 203w, https:\/\/sites.lsa.umich.edu\/oaxaca-archaeology\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/883\/2021\/02\/Fig-18-zz8.39-768x1134.jpg 768w, https:\/\/sites.lsa.umich.edu\/oaxaca-archaeology\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/883\/2021\/02\/Fig-18-zz8.39-1040x1536.jpg 1040w, https:\/\/sites.lsa.umich.edu\/oaxaca-archaeology\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/883\/2021\/02\/Fig-18-zz8.39.jpg 1219w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 520px) 100vw, 520px\" \/><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-align-left wp-block-paragraph\" style=\"font-size:15px\">Figure 18. This Monte Alb\u00e1n II carved stone shows a hieroglyph that has three components: a hill sign, the head of a jackrabbit, and an inverted head with its hair tied in a knot. The inverted head suggests that Monte Alb\u00e1n claimed to have conquered a place called \u201cHill of the Jackrabbit.\u201d (Marcus 2020)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:15%\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\" style=\"font-size:17px\">During Period IIIa of Monte Alb\u00e1n (which climaxed around AD 300 or 400), the theme of some of its monuments was its relationship with Teotihuacan, a rival expansionist state whose capital lay near present-day Mexico City. Some carved stones show named visitors&#8212;in ambassadorial garb&#8212;leaving Teotihuacan, traveling to Oaxaca to attend the dedication of the South Platform where a new Zapotec ruler was inaugurated.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-8f761849 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:15%\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:90%\"><div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-large is-resized\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/sites.lsa.umich.edu\/oaxaca-archaeology\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/883\/2021\/02\/Fig-19-zz9.8-1024x993.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-195\" width=\"572\" height=\"555\" srcset=\"https:\/\/sites.lsa.umich.edu\/oaxaca-archaeology\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/883\/2021\/02\/Fig-19-zz9.8-1024x993.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/sites.lsa.umich.edu\/oaxaca-archaeology\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/883\/2021\/02\/Fig-19-zz9.8-300x291.jpg 300w, https:\/\/sites.lsa.umich.edu\/oaxaca-archaeology\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/883\/2021\/02\/Fig-19-zz9.8-768x744.jpg 768w, https:\/\/sites.lsa.umich.edu\/oaxaca-archaeology\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/883\/2021\/02\/Fig-19-zz9.8-1536x1489.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/sites.lsa.umich.edu\/oaxaca-archaeology\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/883\/2021\/02\/Fig-19-zz9.8-310x300.jpg 310w, https:\/\/sites.lsa.umich.edu\/oaxaca-archaeology\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/883\/2021\/02\/Fig-19-zz9.8.jpg 1857w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 572px) 100vw, 572px\" \/><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-align-left wp-block-paragraph\" style=\"font-size:15px\">Figure 19. These four Monte Alb\u00e1n IIIa carvings were placed at the corners of Monte Alb\u00e1n\u2019s South Platform to commemorate a visit from Teotihuacan ambassadors. (Marcus 2020)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:20%\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\" style=\"font-size:17px\">During the period known as Monte Alb\u00e1n IIIb-IV (perhaps AD 600-900 in conventional radiocarbon years), Monte Alb\u00e1n gradually began to lose its power and influence. As the old Zapotec capital declined, its former tribute territory broke up into a series of competing petty states, no one of which was powerful enough to reunify the valley.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\" style=\"font-size:17px\">According to Marcus\u2019 research, a major concern of the ruling families at these petty states was to legitimize their right to rule. Often this was done using a new type of carved monument, called a \u201cgenealogical register.\u201d Such a register might depict two or three generations of marital pairs, or list successive marital pairs representing up to a dozen generations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-8f761849 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:30%\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:75%\"><div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"alignleft size-large is-resized\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/sites.lsa.umich.edu\/oaxaca-archaeology\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/883\/2021\/02\/Fig-20-zz5.9-559x1024.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-194\" width=\"419\" height=\"768\" srcset=\"https:\/\/sites.lsa.umich.edu\/oaxaca-archaeology\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/883\/2021\/02\/Fig-20-zz5.9-559x1024.jpg 559w, https:\/\/sites.lsa.umich.edu\/oaxaca-archaeology\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/883\/2021\/02\/Fig-20-zz5.9-164x300.jpg 164w, https:\/\/sites.lsa.umich.edu\/oaxaca-archaeology\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/883\/2021\/02\/Fig-20-zz5.9-768x1408.jpg 768w, https:\/\/sites.lsa.umich.edu\/oaxaca-archaeology\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/883\/2021\/02\/Fig-20-zz5.9-838x1536.jpg 838w, https:\/\/sites.lsa.umich.edu\/oaxaca-archaeology\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/883\/2021\/02\/Fig-20-zz5.9.jpg 982w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 419px) 100vw, 419px\" \/><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-align-left wp-block-paragraph\" style=\"font-size:15px\">Figure 20. A genealogical register from Monte Alb\u00e1n IIIb-IV. The hieroglyphs begin at the bottom of the stone, ascend the right edge, and end at the top. Included are the names of six noble couples, including those pictured (Marcus 2020)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:25%\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\" style=\"font-size:17px\">In contrast to earlier Zapotec monuments, which were set in public view, these registers establishing genealogical credentials were usually associated with royal tombs, which had restricted access. This represented a shift from \u201cvertical propaganda\u201d (messages from the elite to commoners) to \u201chorizontal propaganda\u201d (messages from the elite to other elites).&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\" style=\"font-size:17px\">One genealogical register from a royal tomb at a site called \u201cCerro de la Campana,\u201d near Suchilquitongo, contains a hieroglyphic phrase that confirms the word order typical of the Zapotec language. This order is date + verb + subject, which matches the word order of Zapotec sixteenth-century texts and today\u2019s spoken Zapotec.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-8f761849 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:5%\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:90%\"><div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-large is-resized\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/sites.lsa.umich.edu\/oaxaca-archaeology\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/883\/2021\/02\/Fig-21-zz-4.4-top-1024x351.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-212\" width=\"1024\" height=\"351\" srcset=\"https:\/\/sites.lsa.umich.edu\/oaxaca-archaeology\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/883\/2021\/02\/Fig-21-zz-4.4-top-1024x351.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/sites.lsa.umich.edu\/oaxaca-archaeology\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/883\/2021\/02\/Fig-21-zz-4.4-top-300x103.jpg 300w, https:\/\/sites.lsa.umich.edu\/oaxaca-archaeology\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/883\/2021\/02\/Fig-21-zz-4.4-top-768x263.jpg 768w, https:\/\/sites.lsa.umich.edu\/oaxaca-archaeology\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/883\/2021\/02\/Fig-21-zz-4.4-top-1536x527.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/sites.lsa.umich.edu\/oaxaca-archaeology\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/883\/2021\/02\/Fig-21-zz-4.4-top-2048x702.jpg 2048w, https:\/\/sites.lsa.umich.edu\/oaxaca-archaeology\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/883\/2021\/02\/Fig-21-zz-4.4-top-500x172.jpg 500w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\" style=\"font-size:15px\">Figure 21. The word order of the hieroglyphs in this Monte Alb\u00e1n IIIb-IV text, recorded by Arthur Miller at Cerro de la Campana, confirms that the language being used is Zapotec. (Marcus 2020)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:5%\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\" style=\"font-size:17px\">During the final centuries leading up to the Spanish Conquest, Zapotec stone monuments virtually ceased to exist. Writing itself did not disappear, but is known only from a score of carved bones, the main chamber of a tomb at Zaachila, and a few painted cloths. We know much more about the Mixtec and Aztec writing of this late period, known as Monte Alb\u00e1n Period V.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-8f761849 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:2%\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:90%\">\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large is-resized\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/sites.lsa.umich.edu\/oaxaca-archaeology\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/883\/2021\/02\/Fig22_zz17-Lamina-plate-color-1024x179.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-209\" width=\"1450\" height=\"253\" srcset=\"https:\/\/sites.lsa.umich.edu\/oaxaca-archaeology\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/883\/2021\/02\/Fig22_zz17-Lamina-plate-color-1024x179.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/sites.lsa.umich.edu\/oaxaca-archaeology\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/883\/2021\/02\/Fig22_zz17-Lamina-plate-color-300x52.jpg 300w, https:\/\/sites.lsa.umich.edu\/oaxaca-archaeology\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/883\/2021\/02\/Fig22_zz17-Lamina-plate-color-768x134.jpg 768w, https:\/\/sites.lsa.umich.edu\/oaxaca-archaeology\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/883\/2021\/02\/Fig22_zz17-Lamina-plate-color-1536x268.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/sites.lsa.umich.edu\/oaxaca-archaeology\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/883\/2021\/02\/Fig22_zz17-Lamina-plate-color-2048x357.jpg 2048w, https:\/\/sites.lsa.umich.edu\/oaxaca-archaeology\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/883\/2021\/02\/Fig22_zz17-Lamina-plate-color-500x87.jpg 500w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1450px) 100vw, 1450px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\" style=\"font-size:15px\">Figure 22. One portion of a carved bone from Tomb 7 of Monte Alb\u00e1n. To highlight the white images, the bone carver often used pieces of blue turquoise as the background. This Monte Alb\u00e1n V bone records the names of conquered places. (Marcus 2020)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:2%\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:28px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Images on this page are from&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/sites.lsa.umich.edu\/archaeology-books\/2020\/05\/22\/zapotec-monuments-and-political-history\/\"><em>Zapotec Monuments and Political History<\/em>&nbsp;(Marcus 2020<\/a>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\" id=\"block-64ed8ca5-f21c-4586-bf08-7c5ca58184aa\" style=\"font-size:12px\"><strong>Copyright \u00a9 2021&nbsp;University of Michigan Museum of Anthropological Archaeology (UMMAA)<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Four major ethnic groups in ancient Mexico used hieroglyphic writing &#8212;-the Zapotec, the Maya, the Mixtec, and the Aztec. The Zapotec system is both the oldest and the least widely studied. Our oldest carved stone with Zapotec glyphs is Monument &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/sites.lsa.umich.edu\/oaxaca-archaeology\/origins-of-hieroglyphic-writing-2\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3456,"featured_media":55,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"class_list":["post-287","page","type-page","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.lsa.umich.edu\/oaxaca-archaeology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/287","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.lsa.umich.edu\/oaxaca-archaeology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.lsa.umich.edu\/oaxaca-archaeology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.lsa.umich.edu\/oaxaca-archaeology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3456"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.lsa.umich.edu\/oaxaca-archaeology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=287"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/sites.lsa.umich.edu\/oaxaca-archaeology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/287\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":353,"href":"https:\/\/sites.lsa.umich.edu\/oaxaca-archaeology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/287\/revisions\/353"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.lsa.umich.edu\/oaxaca-archaeology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/55"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.lsa.umich.edu\/oaxaca-archaeology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=287"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}