Breaking the Language Barrier – Equitable Teaching

By Annissa Kebede
March 18, 2025

Navigating college is challenging enough, but for first-generation and international students, academic language can feel like a unfamiliar code-making everyday tasks like reading a syllabus or understanding a lecture overwhelming. These barriers impact more than comprehension; they affect students’ confidence, engagement, and overall academic success. Research shows that clarifying complex academic concepts doesn’t weaken rigor—it strengthens learning. By using strategies like Universal Design for Learning, scaffolding, and culturally relevant examples, educators can build more inclusive classrooms where all students thrive.

The goals of this article is to:

  • Provide practical, research-backed strategies to foster equity and accessibility in the classroom, such as clarifying academic language, incorporating culturally relevant teaching examples, and using inclusive pedagogical frameworks like Universal Design for Learning.
  • Raise awareness among instructors about the growing challenges and evolving needs of first-generation and international students by highlighting the academic, cultural, and linguistic barriers these students face.

Imagine stepping into a classroom where every word feels like a puzzle–familiar sounds forming
unfamiliar meanings. For many international and first-generation college students, this is
their everyday reality as they navigate the hidden complexities of academic language.

Clarifying Complex Academic Terminology

Academic language, especially abstract or discipline-specific terms, can be a major barrier to student understanding, often leaving them frustrated or disengaged.

Equitable teaching approaches like Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development emphasize building on students’ existing knowledge to bridge gaps between familiar and new concepts (Artze-Vega et al., 2023). For instance, a science teacher might explain osmosis by first discussing how a sponge absorbs water before addressing cellular processes. Universal Design for Learning encourages using various methods—like visuals, hands-on activities, and plain language—to make content accessible to all students (Meyer & Rose, 2005). For example, In a biology course, create a concept map for the term “ecosystem,” connecting related terms like “producers,”

This image is a visual representation of Vygotsky's Zone of Proximal Development. There are three overlaying circles. The first smallest and inter-most circle displays the text "What a learner can do on their own." The second middle-sized circle displays the text "What a learner can do with help or support." The last largest circle displays the text "What a learner cannot do yet." To the right side of the circles, there is "Zone of proximal development" with an arrow pointing to the middle circle that read "what a learner can do with help or support"
Figure 1 – The Zone of Proximal Development
Source: Norton’s Guide for Equity-Minded Teaching

“consumers,” “energy flow,” and “biodiversity.” Culturally Relevant Pedagogy connects abstract ideas to students’ lived experiences, such as incorporating local grocery store prices into math problems to teach budgeting and percentages. Together, these approaches show how tailoring instruction and offering the necessary support to understand complex academic terminology improves understanding, engagement, and inclusivity in the classroom.

Addressing Faculty Concerns About Rigor and Discipline-Specific Language

Faculty often worry that clarifying academic language might lower course rigor, but research shows the opposite: making language accessible supports deeper learning without sacrificing intellectual challenge. Rigor is often misunderstood as making courses harder without a clear purpose or intent—like assigning excessive readings, strict grading policies with minimal feedback, high-stake assignments, or purposefully vague instructions to name a few. Some instructors may assume that if a student’s struggle with academic language or institutional norms comes from a lack of ability. In reality, these struggles often stem from structural barriers in education. When instructors view students through a deficit lens—a perspective that attributes students’ academic challenges to their backgrounds or lived experiences rather than systemic barriers—they risk underestimating the students’ intelligence and potential.

Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development highlights that rigor means providing tasks just beyond students’ current abilities, which they can achieve with proper support like scaffolding, modeling, or group work (Artze-Vega et al, 2023). When complex language becomes a barrier, scaffolding—building complexity over time rather than overwhelming students all at one—is essential with tools like glossaries, guided discussions, and simplified explanations help students connect new concepts with what they already know.

Strategy #1: Strengthening Comprehension with a Course Glossary

By thoughtfully creating and integrating glossaries, instructors empower students to navigate complex academic vocabulary, ensuring they have the tools to actively engage with and succeed in the course. This approach enhances equity and accessibility while promoting deeper comprehension and retention of key concepts. One effective strategy is to develop a course-specific glossary with clear language and real-word examples. Embedding this glossary into course materials—such as the syllabus or Canvas—ensures easy access and allows it to evolve throughout the term. Encouraging students to actively use and contribute to the glossary through assignments, discussions, or quizzes makes it an interactive and meaningful learning tool.

Example in Action: In a biology course, students could expand on glossary terms like photosynthesis by suggesting examples such as, “Plants using sunlight to grow leaves and produce oxygen, like grass or trees in your yard.” This kind of student-driven contribution makes abstract concepts more relatable and reinforces learning.


Bloom’s Taxonomy similarly emphasizes building a strong foundation in understanding before advancing to higher-level skills like analyzing and creating (Artze-Vega et al., 2023). For example, clear definitions prepare students to develop and apply complex ideas later. Hammond’s (2015) Ready for Rigor framework reinforces that accessibility and rigor go hand in hand because when students clearly understand foundational concepts, they can engage more deeply with complex material. The by-product is greater confidence, critical thinking, and the ability to apply knowledge in meaningful ways.

A pyramid diagram illustrating Bloom's Taxonomy, with six levels: 'Remember' at the bottom (recall facts and basic concepts), 'Understand' (explain ideas or concepts), 'Apply' (use information in new situations), 'Analyze' (draw connections among ideas), 'Evaluate' (justify a stand or decision), and 'Create' at the top (produce new or original work). Each level includes verbs related to that cognitive skill, such as 'define,' 'classify,' 'solve,' and 'design.'
Figure 2 – Bloom’s Taxonomy
Source: Norton’s Guide for Equity-Minded Teaching

Strategy #2: Defining Terms Clearly to Support Student Learning

By employing this strategies, instructors reduce barriers to understanding and foster an inclusive learning environment where students feel confident engaging with academic content. One effective approach is to define terms clearly and step-by-step, starting with a simple explanation before breaking them down further. Contextualizing concepts with real-world examples and relatable experiences helps anchor abstract ideas in students’ existing knowledge. Using analogies and metaphors can also make complex topics more accessible by linking them to familiar experiences. Additionally, introducing new terms with clear, accessible language before gradually incorporating technical vocabulary ensures students build a solid foundation. This approach not only bridges gaps in comprehension but also empowers students to critically analyze and apply new concepts, laying the foundation for lifelong learning.

Example in Action: Instead of saying, “epistemology is the study of knowledge,” say, “epistemology is about understanding how we know what we know. It’s like asking questions such as, ‘What counts as knowledge?’ and ‘How do we decide what’s true or not?’”

Instructors play a crucial role in supporting international and first-generation students, yet higher education institutions have historically overlooked their unique needs, often creating barriers rather than pathways to success. Many first-generation students navigate college without the inherited knowledge of academic norms, resources, and unspoken expectations that their peers may take for granted. Similarly, international students must adapt not only to new academic systems but also to cultural and linguistic differences that can make participation and engagement more challenging. These structural barriers—such as unclear institutional policies, limited culturally responsive support, and assumptions about prior knowledge—can contribute to confusion, isolation, and academic struggles if not properly addressed. Recognizing these challenges allows instructors to create more inclusive learning environments that empower all students to succeed.

This graphic displays four sections for the shared needs of international and first-generation students, the unique needs of international students, the unique needs of First-generation students, and the unique needs of students who hold both identities.

Click on the Plus Sign to Dig Deeper Into Each Groups Needs

Shared Needs of Both International and First-Generation Students
While international and first-generation students face distinct challenges, they share overlapping struggles in navigating unfamiliar academic environments, often due to disparities in cultural capital—the knowledge and skills privileged students acquire through family and social networks. One of the biggest obstacles is understanding academic language, which includes not just discipline-specific terms but also institutional jargon like “office hours,” “plagiarism,” and “academic integrity.” Without explicit guidance, these gaps can lead to hesitation in seeking help and difficulty in fully engaging with coursework. Institutions that address these barriers have seen positive results.

Unique Needs of International Students
International students often encounter barriers in language proficiency and cultural adjustment due to systemic gaps in academic support. While many arrive with strong conversational English skills, the lack of sufficient resources for mastering academic writing and formal presentations can make full participation in coursework more challenging. Cultural differences in classroom norms—such as expectations around participation or how to interact with professors—can further complicate the transition. Beyond academics, visa restrictions create added stress, as maintaining legal status often means balancing strict academic requirements with limited work opportunities. Feelings of isolation can be particularly intense, especially during holidays or breaks when travel home may not be feasible. To address these issues, institutions must offer robust language support, cultural orientation programs, and clear guidance on visa and career opportunities. Fostering inclusive campus environments where international students feel valued can also help them build the support networks necessary for academic and personal success.

Unique Needs of First-Generation Students
First-generation students, meanwhile, navigate systemic barriers shaped by socioeconomic disparities and historically inequitable access to academic preparation. Higher education institutions have often failed to provide adequate support for developing study skills, time management strategies, and a sense of belonging, contributing to experiences of imposter syndrome. At the same time, they frequently balance heavy family responsibilities—whether through financial contributions or caregiving—while also managing the costs of tuition, books, and technology. These intersecting pressures can make it difficult to fully engage in campus life. Institutions can better support first-gen students by offering first-year seminars focused on study strategies, financial assistance programs, and peer mentorship opportunities. Creating a campus culture that recognizes their unique experiences can help foster belonging and ensure they have the resources needed to succeed.

Students who Identity with Both Groups
For students who are both international and first-generation, these challenges are magnified, as they must navigate academic systems, language barriers, and cultural adaptation simultaneously, often without familial guidance. While international students typically have home-country networks to turn to, and first-generation students often find support among peers from similar backgrounds, students with both identities can struggle to find a sense of belonging in either group. They may also experience heightened pressure to succeed due to family expectations, financial sacrifices, or immigration concerns. To support these students, institutions should offer tailored mentorship programs, culturally responsive counseling, and language support that extends beyond grammar to include guidance on navigating higher education norms. By recognizing their distinct needs and fostering inclusive communities, universities can help these students not just survive but thrive

Strategy #3: Fostering Engagement Through Questions and Feedback

Fostering a classroom culture where questions and feedback are actively encouraged reduces barriers to learning, promotes engagement, and empowers students to take ownership of their educational journey. When students feel comfortable asking questions, they are more likely to engage deeply with the material, make connections, and develop critical thinking skills. Normalizing curiosity helps shift the focus from simply “getting the right answer” to truly understanding concepts, which leads to richer discussions and a more dynamic learning environment. By using strategies that validate student inquiries and provide multiple ways to seek clarification, instructors can break down hesitation and foster a space where everyone feels heard.

  1. Normalize Questions and Validate Curiosity: Proactively address the potential for confusion and encourage students to seek clarification by affirming that questions are a natural part of the learning process.
  2. Provide Multiple Avenues for Questions: Offer various ways for students to ask questions, catering to different comfort levels and communication styles.
  3. Foster Peer Learning through Questions: Encourage students to ask and answer questions collaboratively, reinforcing their understanding and promoting active participation.
  4. Model Question-Asking Behaviors: Demonstrate curiosity by posing your own questions about the material and encouraging students to explore the answers with you.
  5. Create a feedback Loop to Close the Gap: Actively respond to questions, both in real time and through follow-up discussions, to ensure students feel their inquiries are valued and addressed.

University of Michigan Resources

To address these challenges, the University of Michigan has developed targeted resources to support international and first-generation students. These tools aim to reduce barriers, build confidence, and promote academic success. These institutional efforts reflect a broader commitment to creating an inclusive and supportive academic environment.

In conclusion, addressing the unique challenges faced by international and first-generation college students at the University of Michigan requires a multifaceted approach rooted in equitable teaching practices. By clarifying complex academic language through resources like the CRLT Acronym Guide and the First-Gen Commitment, fostering inclusive classroom environments, and leveraging resources such as the Sweetland Center for Writing’s international student support services, faculty and staff can actively dismantle barriers to understanding and engagement. These interventions not only enhance equitable outcomes but also promote a sense of belonging and empowerment among students. As Michigan continues to expand its commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion, implementing these practices is not just a pedagogical goal but a responsibility to ensure all students have the tools and support they need to succeed. Through these collective efforts, the University of Michigan can continue to foster an academic environment where every student thrives.

Sources

Artze-Vega, I., Dewsbury, B. M., Rivas, L. M., & Dancy, M. (2023). The Norton Guide to Equity-Minded Teaching. W.W. Norton & Company.

Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. David McKay Company.

Garcia, M., Lee, R., & Patel, S. (2023). Culturally responsive teaching in higher education: A pathway to equity. Journal of Diversity in Education, 12(4), 345–361.

Hammond, Z. (2015). Culturally responsive teaching and the brain: Promoting authentic engagement and rigor among culturally and linguistically diverse students. Corwin.

Johnson, T., Brown, L., & Green, P. (2023). The psychological impact of academic expectations on first-generation students. The Journal of College Student Development, 64(2), 123–139.

Liu, Y., Chen, H., & Adams, J. (2023). Academic language barriers and international student success: A cross-institutional analysis. International Journal of Higher Education, 42(1), 78–95.

Meyer, A., & Rose, D. H. (2005). Universal design for learning: Theory and practice. CAST Professional Publishing.

Pascarella, E. T., Pierson, C. T., Wolniak, G. C., & Terenzini, P. T. (2004). First-generation college students: Additional evidence on college experiences and outcomes. The Journal of Higher Education, 75(3), 249–284.

Purdue Global. (2023). Purdue Global first-generation students create educational definitions dictionary to help navigate school. Retrieved from https://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/2023/Q4/purdue-global-first-generation-students-create-educational-definitions-dictionary-to-help-navigate-school/

Smith, J., & Williams, K. (2023). Institutional language barriers and first-generation student outcomes. Higher Education Research, 58(3), 211–230.

University of Michigan Office of Budget and Planning. (2016). UMAA infographic. University of Michigan. https://obp.umich.edu/campus-statistics/

University of Michigan Office of Budget and Planning. (2023). Fall 2023 campus infographic. University of Michigan. https://obp.umich.edu/campus-statistics/

University of Minnesota Open Textbooks. (n.d.). Bridges: United States academia for first-generation and international college students. Retrieved from https://open.umn.edu/opentextbooks/textbooks/bridges-united-states-academia-for-first-generation-and-international-college-students

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.).

Harvard University Press.Zhang, X., & Kim, J. (2023). Addressing retention through academic support for international students. Studies in Higher Education, 48(5), 712–729.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

lsa logoum logoU-M Privacy StatementAccessibility at U-M